Codemasters' long-going for walks rally game has again for its twelfth lap, launching to in large part high quality reviews remaining Tuesday on PC, Xbox and PS4. With up to date drivers from AMD and Nvidia arriving just a few days later, it seemed like an ideal time to look how the title runs on current and former-technology GPUs.

AMD's Crimson ReLive Edition 17.6.1 driver claims up to a 30% performance development over the previous driver for the RX 580 when the usage of 8xMSAA. None of my checks will use better than 4xMSAA as this is what the extremely preset permits, however you could anticipate greater most suitable overall performance throughout the board with this motive force. As for Nvidia, its 382.53 WHQL driving force claims to offer an choicest gaming experience for Dirt four, even though given the overall performance we recorded, there's probably already a extra 'highest quality' driving force in the works. We'll observe the numbers rapidly, however as a piece of a spoiler we will say that the crimson team has an area in this title for now.

We'll be focusing exclusively on contemporary and previous technology pics playing cards tested at 1080p, 1440p and 4K. Please note the Radeon RX 480 and 470 were dropped since they may be just like the more recent RX 580 and 570. Even with out those cards, we tested a grand total of 27 GPUs, in order that have to give you a stable reference point.

All testing changed into carried out the use of our normal Core i7-7700K gadget clocked at 4.9GHz. We decided to bypass CPU scaling results for this title as Dirt 4 does not require a effective CPU, and from some internal assessments we figured that a contemporary twin-core CPU with Hyper-Threading which include the Pentium G4560 does properly. The recreation heavily masses a single thread and on the most makes use of two threads successfully. Beyond that, on most modern-day quad-core or greater CPUs you'll see 20% or much less load on extra threads.

That doesn't suggest the sport is poorly optimized, it simply manner it is not CPU extensive. This isn't an Arma 3 kind of state of affairs in which a unmarried thread gets pounded and the CPU continues to be the performance restricting element. In different words, I'm not seeing a CPU bottleneck in this game. Of course, it might be higher if the EGO four.0 game engine dispensed load greater calmly, but it is now not an problem for a game like Dirt 4 this is typically GPU-certain.

For those of you thinking, I noticed almost no distinction in performance when the use of the GTX 1080 Ti at 1080p using both the Pentium G4560 or a closely overclocked Core i7-7700K, the CPU honestly makes little difference here. The Ryzen five 1400, 1600 and 1700 additionally added similar performance and again had been all capable of kind of max out the 1080 Ti.

Using a GeForce 10 series GPU, the game consumes almost 4GB of VRAM at 1080p the use of the Ultra satisfactory settings, approximately four.5GB at 1440p and round 6GB at 4K. Using an AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB, these figures had been slightly inflated hitting four.5GB at 1080p, just over 5GB at 1440p and seven.5GB at 4K. This is proof that Nvidia's memory compression era is barely superior.

When it involves system reminiscence usage, the game commonly consumes ~4 - 5GB relying on its configuration. The exception to this may be seen while the use of a snap shots card proposing a restricted VRAM buffer at resolutions it can't deal with. Anyway, 8GB of RAM need to have you covered. That's about all we had to cover in our prelude to Dirt four's pix overall performance...

Test System Specs & Memory

  • Intel Core i7-7700K @ four.9 GHz
  • Asrock Z270 Extreme4
  • 32GB DDR4-3000 RAM
  • Samsung SSD 850 Evo 2TB
  • MSI GTX 1060 Gaming X [3GB]
  • Auros RX 570 [4GB]
  • Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
  • GeForce Game Ready Driver 382.53
  • Crimson ReLive Edition 17.6.1

1080p Performance

Right away we see the GTX 960 trailing the R9 380 through a 17% margin whilst the GTX 970 become 31% slower than the R9 390. In truth, although the GTX 980 Ti was able to drag in advance of the R9 390X by a small margin whilst evaluating the common frame charge, it become five% slower whilst comparing the minimal.

Meanwhile, the Fury X pulled head of the GTX 980 Ti and 1070 at 1080p with a mean of 96fps making it round 20% quicker and 30% faster while comparing the minimum frame fee. Even when it comes to the GTX 1080 the Fury X appeared top at simplest 10 fps slower. Of course the Titan XP and GTX 1080 Ti have been faster again, however you'll naturally anticipate them to be.

Higher-cease Nvidia GPUs are suffering a few sort of difficulty with minimal body rates this is abnormal however worth maintaining a watch on.

1440p Performance

Jumping up to 1440p sees few GPUs capable of achieving 60fps and it does change things quite considerably as now the Nvidia GPUs come proper back into play. The GTX 1060 is not a outstanding deal slower than the RX 580 now, or as a minimum as compared to what we noticed at 1080p. The GTX 1070 pulls beforehand of RX 580 providing barely higher minimum frame fee overall performance with a much stronger common.

It turned into nearly like we had been seeing a driver overhead difficulty for Nvidia at 1080p, wouldn't that be ironic. Further down, we see the GTX 960 is now only a unmarried frame slower than the R9 380. That stated, the GTX 970 continues to be quite a piece slower than the R9 390, trailing by a 25% margin.

The GTX 980 Ti can close in at the Fury X although it's still quite a bit slower whilst evaluating minimal body fees. The 46 fps minimum of the 980 Ti approach it may best in shape the Nano and 390X.

4K Performance

Finally at 4K it's just the GTX 1080 Ti that destroy the 60fps barrier. I have to notice that the Gigabyte Aorus GTX 1080 Ti became used for trying out even as the Titan XP is manifestly a reference card.

Quality Preset Comparisons

*Note: The following exams used a distinct section of the game and as a consequence those numbers may not align with the relaxation of our results -- developments could be similar, but.

Last up we've got a few excellent preset checking out which has been done at 1440p the use of the GTX 1060 and RX 580. Whereas the GTX 1060 was almost 30% slower using the ultra pleasant preset, it narrowed that margin to eleven% slower when playing on high nice. When moving to medium the 1060 controlled to drag in advance through about 10% and this changed into additionally visible whilst using the low and extremely low presets as well.

There is truely something enabled or turned up with the high and ultra presets that hurts Nvidia extra than it does AMD.

Before wrapping matters up, here is a quick observe the numerous nice presets side-by-side, recorded the use of the Titan XP at 4K.

Wrapping it up

AMD is displaying robust overall performance in Dirt 4, especially whilst searching at minimum frame prices. That stated, in case you're inclined to drop the pleasant preset from extremely to high or medium, Nvidia does catch up or even profits an side at the lower settings -- once more, we're not positive what is hampering the GeForce playing cards at higher features.

When decreasing the settings from ultra to high, the GTX 1060 saw a huge 60% increase in performance even as the RX 580 progressed through forty% -- those are some quite massive numbers for what works out to be a minor loss in visual exceptional in case you ask us. Running the game at high allowed both of those playing cards to average nicely over 60fps at 1440p, so except you're running excessive hardware we propose the use of the high nice preset in want of extremely, although this is real for almost all modern video games. As standard, flora is what absolutely hammers performance whilst set to extremely. Courses with little plant life ran at over 70fps with a mid-range images playing cards and that discern would frequently be halved with heavy flora (which is how I examined).

When it comes to CPU overall performance, the sport virtually best makes use of one or two threads and at the same time as that sounds bad, this just is not a sport that requires loads of resources here to run nicely.

  • Check out DiRT 4 Reviews and Ratings

Overall, assuming you have a contemporary graphics card, you can expect clean overall performance from Dirt 4, in particular on excessive best even though playable frame fees on extremely are some distance from impossible.

In case you neglected it:

  • RX 580 vs. GTX 1060: 27 Game Battle
  • AMD Radeon RX 550 + Intel Pentium G4560: The Ultimate eSports Combo?
  • Mass Effect: Andromeda Graphics Performance Tested