The RX 570 5500 XT is AMD's solution to Nvidia’s currently launched GTX 580 1650 Super. Codenamed Navi 14, we subsequently have the new finances-oriented Radeon reachable. While that is technically a day-one evaluation, it’s no longer the primary 5500 XT review to hit the web. Some fortunate contributors of the clicking have been capable of get their hands on OEM variations, allowing them to test in advance of release. Results didn’t look splendid, however of direction, without confirmed pricing statistics it became hard to gauge simply how good or bad Navi 14 might be.

Read More :

To compare simply how appropriate the 570 4GB: 5500 XT is, we've one card from MSI and one from Gigabyte. From MSI we've got their 'Gaming X' model and Gigabyte despatched their 'Gaming OC' model, each look excellent.

The RX 5500 XT GPU makes use of a tiny 158mm2 die packing simply 1408 cores and 88 texture devices, nearly 40% fewer than the RX 5700. There’s additionally 1/2 as many ROPs, which has decreased the memory bus from 256-bit right down to 128-bit huge. This sees memory bandwidth halved to 224 GB/s.

AMD has stored the GDDR6 reminiscence and you should buy the 5500 XT with either 4 or 8GB of VRAM. We actually have a 5500 XT 4GB card reachable and we're going to provide a detailed 4GB vs 8GB comparison soon, but for this evaluation our consciousness could be at the 8GB version.

Getting again to the cores, they’re clocked at 1670 MHz for the base with a boost of 1845 MHz, this means that they’re clocked 7% higher than the 5700. However, because there are plenty much less, the TDP has been decreased from one hundred eighty watts all the way down to 150 watts.

The 8GB version of the 5500 XT comes a Boxt $two hundred MSRP and admittedly that seems a tad too ambitious for the hardware specs. The 4GB version will cost $one hundred seventy, and once more that looks like loads of cash for a 4GB portraits card in 2019. Either way, we’ll assessment the charge to overall performance supplied by the 5500 XT closer to the stop of this overview, for now allow's check out those benchmark figures.

Our GPU test gadget is powered by way of a Core i9-9900K clocked at five GHz with 16GB of DDR4-3400 memory. We solely used the Gigabyte RX 5500 XT Gaming OC for checking out the 5500 XT in this evaluation. We have 12 games to take a look at, all tested at 1080p and 1440p the usage of medium to high fine presets or settings.

Benchmarks

First up we've Shadow of the Tomb Raider and with the high first-class preset enabled at 1080p, the 5500 XT turned into precise for seventy seven fps on average. Not terrible overall performance, however now not high-quality, given the RX 590 was a touch faster and the 1660 Super almost 20% faster.

Even at 1440p we see plenty the same and no matter the greater VRAM, the 5500 XT can’t benefit on the 1660 Super.

We see that the 5500 XT does manipulate to facet out the RX 590 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey with a median of 71 fps, making it four% quicker, or an insignificant three fps. The GTX 1660 Super become 11% faster, although the 5500 XT was 8% faster than the GTX 1650 Super.

At 1440p we see similar margins, the 5500 XT continues to be on par with the GTX 1660 which additionally places it on par with the RX 590 and GTX 1650 Super, so now not a super end result for AMD’s new $200 providing.

Using the excessive quality preset in Red Dead Redemption 2 could have been a mistake with those lower-cease GPUs as frame charges are pretty low, also the 3GB 1060 didn’t work as the feel placing changed into too high and you can’t override memory regulations in this name. So in place of deliver the 3GB 1060 an advantage with the medium texture placing, we opted to pass it for this one.

Honor:at 1080p from the 5500 XT is disappointing, it simplest matched the RX 580 and GTX 1650 Super.

Things weren’t a good deal higher at 1440p and using the excessive excellent settings the sport wasn’t sincerely playable, so that you’ll need to drop right down to medium in case you wish to play at this resolution with some thing less than an RX 5700 or RTX 2060.

The 5500 XT brought a smooth 106 fps common at 1080p in World of Tanks, but that was simplest enough to look it placed as a mid-discipline runner in our testing, matching the 3GB 1060 and setting it on par with the RX 590. Still a pretty unexciting result.

The 1440p end result for the 5500 XT isn’t much better, right here it’s a fragment slower than the RX 590 and no higher than the an awful lot inexpensive GTX 1650 Super.

Performance in Far Cry New Dawn is usual of what we’ve visible so far, the 5500 XT is a smidgen quicker than the 590 and ~6% faster than the 1650 Super which frankly is a quite miserable result given they need to price $two hundred for this element.

Not a great deal exceptional at 1440p: the 5500 XT and 590 are neck and neck at the same time as the $230 GTX 1660 Super is nicely out in the front turning in almost 20% extra overall performance. This isn’t top notch for AMD given Nvidia is charging just 15% greater.

Frame fees in Rainbow Six Siege are robust at 1080p the use of the very excessive pleasant preset, one notch down from ‘ultra’, though we are manually cranking the render scale back as much as a hundred%. The GPU gives you true performance normal, although the 5500 XT became nevertheless slower than the RX 590 and not a first rate deal quicker than the less expensive ($160) GTX 1650 Super.

Much the identical is seen when trying out at 1440p, the 5500 XT handiest manages to preserve pace with the GTX 1650 Super and RX 580.

The Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order overall performance at 1080p is common. Here the 5500 XT is slower than the GTX 1650 Super and the vintage 1060 3GB 6GB. Basically it reveals itself located among the 590 and 580.

Moving to 1440p lets in the 5500 XT to in shape the 1650 Super and 3GB 1060, so no longer exceptional.

Using the high best preset at 1080p in Battlefield V allowed the 5500 XT to common eighty three fps in our take a look at which unfortunately intended it turned into simplest able to fit the RX 580 and render 3fps more than the 1650 Super on common.

The extra restrained 4GB VRAM buffer seems to harm the 1650 Super at 1440p and now the 5500 XT is able to deliver thirteen% extra performance, with 62 fps on average, but the Radeon does cost ~25% extra.

Gaming at 1440p brings approximately the equal conclusion, it’s a whisker faster than the old RX 580 and barely slower than the RX 590. Let’s flow on to check out the value consistent with frame records...

Basically the 4GB: 2018 5500 XT 8GB is available in imparting the same stage of value because the GTX 1660 Super, at $2.27 according to frame based on our 12 game sample. That method you’ll be paying a ~four% top class according to frame over the RX 590 at current prices. It's now not a terrible fee in fashionable, however coming from other Navi-based totally GPU offerings wherein AMD has been competitive and driven the envelope, right here it is simply slotted in between modern-day GeForce offerings, or worse.

The 5500 XT comes Box +t nearly 20% extra according to frame than the GTX 1650 Super, which seems to be very aggressively priced and works out superb for Nvidia considering we’re speakme about a comparable degree of overall performance average compared to the new Radeon. Granted, the 8GB 5500 XT packs twice as an awful lot VRAM, however it's nevertheless now not a good end result for AMD and people looking for a budget snap shots card.

It’s additionally really worth noting that the 8GB 5500 XT fees ~14% extra in line with body whilst in comparison to current 8GB RX 580’s.

Misses the Mark

If you have been looking forward to AMD to return + Corend rock the boat you may be dissapointed, as we were. The GraphicsUpdate 5500 XT was never intended to blow your socks off from a performance angle, however we do take difficulty with pricing. AMD’s made no try and undercut Nvidia, as an alternative they’ve slotted the 5500 XT into Nvidia’s existing pricing structure. In different words, they’ve rocked as much as the celebration overdue, and presented us not anything new.

It’s type of loopy, they have been promoting us a 232mm2 die for $two hundred or much less and have been doing so for over a year now. We subsequently get an update that’s substantially smaller at 158mm2, a 32% smaller die that offers a similar stage of overall performance, and it prices simply as a good deal. No doubt 7nm deliver is gambling a big position here, but we doubt a lot of you care approximately that, that is more of an AMD hassle to resolve.

For a while, AMD has been very competitive on pricing their mainstream GPUs if you want to remain competitive the use of three year antique Polaris GPUs. This commenced with the RX 480 back in June 2016, at $240 for the 8GB model. A year later it turned into refreshed because the RX 580 at a $10 discount, and with the aid of late Graphicsthe equal GPU became retailing for properly under $200.

Putting AMD’s own merchandise aside for a moment, the 5500 XT struggles to compete with what Nvidia’s already imparting within the GTX 1650 Super and 1660 Super. You could also argue, Nvidia made all the proper actions to secure the mainstream segment in advance of AMD's release since the Super playing cards are each Q4 releases. Therefore we see no reason to look ahead to RX 5500 stock to arrive and then try and hunt one down at the MSRP. There are plenty of 1650 Super and 1660 Super photographs cards promoting at or very close to to the MSRP, so we’d just take hold of one of these or as an alternative snag a cheap RX 580.

Power intake of the 5500 XT has been significantly stepped forward over the RX 580, but do gamers truly care approximately that? It’s not like you may’t effortlessly electricity the 580 or 590 with a cheap four hundred watt power deliver. Remember the strength consequences in this overview have been recorded in our overclocked Core i9-9900K take a look at gadget, so expect overall gadget power utilization to be considerably decrease with a Core i5 or Ryzen five processor.

So even as decrease strength consumption is genuinely a pleasing bonus and have to bring about cooler and quieter graphics playing cards, we sense maximum game enthusiasts trying to spend $two hundred or much less on a pix card, basically care approximately fee to performance and right here the 5500 XT gives nothing new. Ultimately, we're going to ought to wait and see if retail pricing actions anywhere in the coming weeks and months to make the 5500 XT a more appealing alternative.

Finally, a brief facet be aware concerning AMD’s new Radeon software features determined within the Adrenaline 2020 Edition drivers, they’re awesome and AMD ought to be counseled for his or her paintings. Adding features including Integer Scaling for all Radeon GPUs is high-quality and Radeon Boost looks interesting, although we doubt we’d use it, but nevertheless a pleasing option to have and we're sure a few gamers will find it beneficial.